Methodology

How We Review & Score Products | Methodology | ScreenExtendersHub
Review Methodology v1.0

How We Review
& Score Products

Our 5-step engineering framework evaluates every product through workflow context, hardware constraints, compatibility risk analysis, and full trade-off disclosure. No spec-sheet regurgitation. No commission-driven rankings. Read our full disclosure.

0+
Products Tested
0
Step Framework
0
Published Reviews
0
Categories
Chapter 01

The 5-Step Review Framework

Every product passes through this decision architecture before a rating is assigned. See our Buying Guide to see it in action.

1
Workflow Context
Who uses it, how, and where?
2
Hardware Constraints
Ports, GPU limits, power delivery.
3
Compatibility Risks
Failure modes other sites skip.
4
Trade-Off Analysis
Every gain has a cost. We quantify both.
5
Full Disclosure
Step 01

Understand Workflow Context

Before evaluating any product, we identify who would use it and how. A portable monitor for a traveling consultant has different requirements than a desktop extender for a day trader. Context determines every subsequent evaluation decision.
Primary use case identification: remote work, trading, development, design
Environment mapping: travel frequency, desk permanence, workspace type
Workflow pattern analysis: window count, app complexity, information density
Ergonomic baseline: posture habits, viewing distance, monitor arrangement
User Persona MappingWorkflow Audit
Chapter 02

How Ratings Map to Recommendations

Our scale ranges from 8.0 to 9.3 across 23 reviewed products. We do not review products scoring below 8.0. See Comparisons for full product data.

9.0–9.3

Exceptional

Outstanding performance with minimal compromises. Defines the category. Example: Anker 778 Thunderbolt 4 (9.3).

Strong Buy
8.6–8.9

Strong Performer

Reliable with clear strengths and minor limitations. Featured in our Buying Guide recommendations.

Recommended
8.2–8.5

Capable with Caveats

Notable trade-offs limiting audience. Reviews include "who should NOT buy" and alternatives from other categories.

Conditional
8.0–8.1

Baseline Acceptable

Minimum quality with significant limitations. We often recommend upgrading. Check comparison data for alternatives.

Alternatives First
Chapter 03

Scoring Breakdown by Category

Each product category has its own weighted criteria reflecting real-world impact. Click a category to see how we weight the final score.

Hinge Stress & Weight
25%
OS & Driver Compatibility
25%
Display Quality
20%
Power Draw
15%
Build & Portability
15%
Total Weight
100%
Panel Quality
25%
Connectivity
25%
Portability Score
20%
Stand & Ergonomics
15%
Power Requirements
15%
Total Weight
100%
Ergonomic Design
30%
Display Consistency
25%
Build Durability
20%
Connectivity & Layout
15%
Thermal Performance
10%
Total Weight
100%
Port Standards & Bandwidth
30%
Display Output
25%
Power Delivery
20%
OS Compatibility
15%
Build & Thermal
10%
Total Weight
100%
Chapter 04

What We Refuse to Do

These anti-patterns are common across affiliate sites. We reject every one. Read About Us for our editorial principles.

We Never Do This

Commission-Based Rankings

Ranking products by affiliate payout instead of quality.

Manufacturer-Provided Scores

Accepting or publishing scores from manufacturers.

Spec-Sheet-Only Reviews

Rewriting Amazon descriptions as if it were a review.

Hidden Affiliate Links

Disguising monetized links without transparent labeling.

Universal Recommendations

"Best for everyone" blanket verdicts with no context.

Urgency Tactics

Countdown timers, "limited time" pressure, scarcity manipulation.

What We Do Instead

Weighted Criteria Scoring

Rankings by our framework per category.

Independent Testing

Every metric from our own testing across multiple devices and OSes.

Real-World Workflow Testing

Hands-on testing and trade-off analysis.

Full Disclosure on Every Page

Disclosure present, links only after education.

Workflow-Specific Verdicts

Suitability verdicts with "who should NOT buy" sections.

Calm, Evidence-Based Guidance

Through FAQ and category pages.

Chapter 05

Testing Equipment & Environment

Transparency requires disclosing what we test on. Our environment replicates real-world conditions across common hardware configurations.

Test Laptops

  • MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, macOS Sonoma)
  • Dell XPS 15 (Intel i7-13700H, Win 11)
  • Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 11
  • HP Spectre x360 (Intel/AMD variants)
  • Framework Laptop 13 (Linux testing)

Operating Systems

  • Windows 11 Pro (23H2+)
  • Windows 10 22H2
  • macOS Sonoma 14.x / Ventura 13.x
  • Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
  • ChromeOS (Flex and native)

Cables & Adapters

  • Thunderbolt 4 certified cables (0.8m, 2m)
  • USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (DP Alt Mode verified)
  • HDMI 2.1 and 2.0 reference cables
  • USB-C to HDMI adapters (multiple chipsets)
  • USB-A 3.0 adapters for legacy testing

Measurement Tools

  • USB-C power meter (voltage, amperage, wattage)
  • Digital scale (0.1g precision)
  • Colorimeter for display calibration
  • Lux meter for brightness measurement
  • Infrared thermometer for thermal testing

Test Protocols

  • 24-hour burn-in test for stability
  • Multi-display stress test (4K + 1080p)
  • Hot-plug and wake-from-sleep cycling
  • Sustained load thermal measurement
  • Real-world workflow simulation

Documentation

  • Standardized scoring spreadsheet
  • Photo documentation of test setups
  • Failure-mode logging with timestamps
  • Driver version tracking across tests
  • Version-controlled methodology updates
Chapter 06

How Affiliate Relationships Work

ScreenExtendersHub earns revenue through affiliate links. When you click a product link and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. This is how we fund our testing equipment, hosting, and content development.

Affiliate revenue never influences our ratings, rankings, or recommendations. Our editorial process is completed before any monetization decisions are made. If the best answer is "do not buy this product," we publish that verdict.

We are transparent about this relationship because trust requires it. Every page with affiliate links includes our full disclosure statement. Read our About Us page for our complete editorial philosophy.

Our content is governed by a simple test: could this page exist unchanged if we removed every affiliate link? If no, it does not belong on ScreenExtendersHub. Learn more in our Terms of Service and Disclaimer.

Amazon Associates Disclosure

ScreenExtendersHub is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Full details on our Disclosure page.

Our Guarantees

Ratings determined before affiliate links are added
Commission rates never influence product rankings
"Do not buy" verdicts published when warranted
Non-affiliate alternatives recommended when superior
Full disclosure on every page with affiliate links
No manufacturer-sponsored content or paid placements
Chapter 07

Transparency Commitments

These commitments are non-negotiable. They define how we operate and how we hold ourselves accountable to readers and the broader ScreenExtendersHub community.

Methodology Versioning

This page is versioned. Changes are documented with dates and rationale. Current version: 1.0 (January 2025).

Reader Feedback Loop

Report errors, challenge ratings, or suggest improvements via our Contact page.

Correction Policy

Factual errors corrected within 48 hours with a visible correction notice. Scores updated if new data warrants it.

Testing Reproducibility

Test protocols documented in detail so results could be independently verified with similar equipment.

No Pay-for-Play

We do not accept payment from manufacturers for reviews, scores, or placement. Read our full disclosure policy.

Chapter 08

Common Questions About Our Process

Questions about how we review, score, and recommend products. For product-specific questions, see our main FAQ page.

How do you decide which products to review?
We prioritize products with significant market presence, unique positioning within their category, or widespread user interest. We do not accept products for review from manufacturers. Products scoring below our 8.0 threshold during initial assessment are not published.
Why do your ratings only range from 8.0 to 9.3?
Because we do not publish reviews for products that fail our quality threshold. Products below 8.0 are either too flawed, too incompatible, or too poorly built to warrant detailed coverage. Reviewing bad products generates content; it does not generate value.
How often are reviews updated?
Reviews are updated when: (1) firmware or driver updates materially change performance, (2) new compatibility data emerges from reader feedback, (3) pricing shifts alter the value proposition, or (4) a directly competing product launches that changes the competitive landscape.
Do you test every product yourself?
Our reviews combine engineering-grade compatibility analysis, manufacturer specifications, verified user reports, and hands-on testing where available. We clearly distinguish between directly tested findings and analytically derived conclusions. See our Disclaimer for full details.
Can I suggest a product for review?
Yes. Use our Contact page to suggest products. We prioritize suggestions based on market relevance, reader demand, and whether the product fills a gap in our existing category coverage.
How do you handle conflicts of interest?
Our primary conflict-of-interest policy: affiliate revenue cannot influence editorial decisions. Ratings are finalized before monetization links are added. Commission rates are never disclosed to editorial staff before review completion. See our Disclosure page for our complete affiliate relationship documentation.
What happens if I disagree with a rating?
We welcome substantive disagreements. Contact us with specific data points — your hardware, OS, use case, and experience. If your evidence contradicts our findings, we will update the review with credit.

Explore Our Reviews

Now that you understand how we evaluate products, explore our detailed category pages with full reviews, specifications, and recommendations.

How We Review & Score Products | Methodology | ScreenExtendersHub
Review Methodology v1.0

How We Review
& Score Products

Our 5-step engineering framework evaluates every product through workflow context, hardware constraints, compatibility risk analysis, and full trade-off disclosure. No spec-sheet regurgitation. No commission-driven rankings. Read our full disclosure.

0+
Products Tested
0
Step Framework
0
Published Reviews
0
Categories
Chapter 01

The 5-Step Review Framework

Every product passes through this decision architecture before a rating is assigned. See our Buying Guide to see it in action.

1
Workflow Context
Who uses it, how, and where?
2
Hardware Constraints
Ports, GPU limits, power delivery.
3
Compatibility Risks
Failure modes other sites skip.
4
Trade-Off Analysis
Every gain has a cost. We quantify both.
5
Full Disclosure
Step 01

Understand Workflow Context

Before evaluating any product, we identify who would use it and how. A portable monitor for a traveling consultant has different requirements than a desktop extender for a day trader. Context determines every subsequent evaluation decision.
Primary use case identification: remote work, trading, development, design
Environment mapping: travel frequency, desk permanence, workspace type
Workflow pattern analysis: window count, app complexity, information density
Ergonomic baseline: posture habits, viewing distance, monitor arrangement
User Persona MappingWorkflow Audit
Chapter 02

How Ratings Map to Recommendations

Our scale ranges from 8.0 to 9.3 across 23 reviewed products. We do not review products scoring below 8.0. See Comparisons for full product data.

9.0–9.3

Exceptional

Outstanding performance with minimal compromises. Defines the category. Example: Anker 778 Thunderbolt 4 (9.3).

Strong Buy
8.6–8.9

Strong Performer

Reliable with clear strengths and minor limitations. Featured in our Buying Guide recommendations.

Recommended
8.2–8.5

Capable with Caveats

Notable trade-offs limiting audience. Reviews include "who should NOT buy" and alternatives from other categories.

Conditional
8.0–8.1

Baseline Acceptable

Minimum quality with significant limitations. We often recommend upgrading. Check comparison data for alternatives.

Alternatives First
Chapter 03

Scoring Breakdown by Category

Each product category has its own weighted criteria reflecting real-world impact. Click a category to see how we weight the final score.

Hinge Stress & Weight
25%
OS & Driver Compatibility
25%
Display Quality
20%
Power Draw
15%
Build & Portability
15%
Total Weight
100%
Panel Quality
25%
Connectivity
25%
Portability Score
20%
Stand & Ergonomics
15%
Power Requirements
15%
Total Weight
100%
Ergonomic Design
30%
Display Consistency
25%
Build Durability
20%
Connectivity & Layout
15%
Thermal Performance
10%
Total Weight
100%
Port Standards & Bandwidth
30%
Display Output
25%
Power Delivery
20%
OS Compatibility
15%
Build & Thermal
10%
Total Weight
100%
Chapter 04

What We Refuse to Do

These anti-patterns are common across affiliate sites. We reject every one. Read About Us for our editorial principles.

We Never Do This

Commission-Based Rankings

Ranking products by affiliate payout instead of quality.

Manufacturer-Provided Scores

Accepting or publishing scores from manufacturers.

Spec-Sheet-Only Reviews

Rewriting Amazon descriptions as if it were a review.

Hidden Affiliate Links

Disguising monetized links without transparent labeling.

Universal Recommendations

"Best for everyone" blanket verdicts with no context.

Urgency Tactics

Countdown timers, "limited time" pressure, scarcity manipulation.

What We Do Instead

Weighted Criteria Scoring

Rankings by our framework per category.

Independent Testing

Every metric from our own testing across multiple devices and OSes.

Real-World Workflow Testing

Hands-on testing and trade-off analysis.

Full Disclosure on Every Page

Disclosure present, links only after education.

Workflow-Specific Verdicts

Suitability verdicts with "who should NOT buy" sections.

Calm, Evidence-Based Guidance

Through FAQ and category pages.

Chapter 05

Testing Equipment & Environment

Transparency requires disclosing what we test on. Our environment replicates real-world conditions across common hardware configurations.

Test Laptops

  • MacBook Pro 14" (M3 Pro, macOS Sonoma)
  • Dell XPS 15 (Intel i7-13700H, Win 11)
  • Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 11
  • HP Spectre x360 (Intel/AMD variants)
  • Framework Laptop 13 (Linux testing)

Operating Systems

  • Windows 11 Pro (23H2+)
  • Windows 10 22H2
  • macOS Sonoma 14.x / Ventura 13.x
  • Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
  • ChromeOS (Flex and native)

Cables & Adapters

  • Thunderbolt 4 certified cables (0.8m, 2m)
  • USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (DP Alt Mode verified)
  • HDMI 2.1 and 2.0 reference cables
  • USB-C to HDMI adapters (multiple chipsets)
  • USB-A 3.0 adapters for legacy testing

Measurement Tools

  • USB-C power meter (voltage, amperage, wattage)
  • Digital scale (0.1g precision)
  • Colorimeter for display calibration
  • Lux meter for brightness measurement
  • Infrared thermometer for thermal testing

Test Protocols

  • 24-hour burn-in test for stability
  • Multi-display stress test (4K + 1080p)
  • Hot-plug and wake-from-sleep cycling
  • Sustained load thermal measurement
  • Real-world workflow simulation

Documentation

  • Standardized scoring spreadsheet
  • Photo documentation of test setups
  • Failure-mode logging with timestamps
  • Driver version tracking across tests
  • Version-controlled methodology updates
Chapter 06

How Affiliate Relationships Work

ScreenExtendersHub earns revenue through affiliate links. When you click a product link and make a purchase, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. This is how we fund our testing equipment, hosting, and content development.

Affiliate revenue never influences our ratings, rankings, or recommendations. Our editorial process is completed before any monetization decisions are made. If the best answer is "do not buy this product," we publish that verdict.

We are transparent about this relationship because trust requires it. Every page with affiliate links includes our full disclosure statement. Read our About Us page for our complete editorial philosophy.

Our content is governed by a simple test: could this page exist unchanged if we removed every affiliate link? If no, it does not belong on ScreenExtendersHub. Learn more in our Terms of Service and Disclaimer.

Amazon Associates Disclosure

ScreenExtendersHub is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. Full details on our Disclosure page.

Our Guarantees

Ratings determined before affiliate links are added
Commission rates never influence product rankings
"Do not buy" verdicts published when warranted
Non-affiliate alternatives recommended when superior
Full disclosure on every page with affiliate links
No manufacturer-sponsored content or paid placements
Chapter 07

Transparency Commitments

These commitments are non-negotiable. They define how we operate and how we hold ourselves accountable to readers and the broader ScreenExtendersHub community.

Methodology Versioning

This page is versioned. Changes are documented with dates and rationale. Current version: 1.0 (January 2025).

Reader Feedback Loop

Report errors, challenge ratings, or suggest improvements via our Contact page.

Correction Policy

Factual errors corrected within 48 hours with a visible correction notice. Scores updated if new data warrants it.

Testing Reproducibility

Test protocols documented in detail so results could be independently verified with similar equipment.

No Pay-for-Play

We do not accept payment from manufacturers for reviews, scores, or placement. Read our full disclosure policy.

Chapter 08

Common Questions About Our Process

Questions about how we review, score, and recommend products. For product-specific questions, see our main FAQ page.

How do you decide which products to review?
We prioritize products with significant market presence, unique positioning within their category, or widespread user interest. We do not accept products for review from manufacturers. Products scoring below our 8.0 threshold during initial assessment are not published.
Why do your ratings only range from 8.0 to 9.3?
Because we do not publish reviews for products that fail our quality threshold. Products below 8.0 are either too flawed, too incompatible, or too poorly built to warrant detailed coverage. Reviewing bad products generates content; it does not generate value.
How often are reviews updated?
Reviews are updated when: (1) firmware or driver updates materially change performance, (2) new compatibility data emerges from reader feedback, (3) pricing shifts alter the value proposition, or (4) a directly competing product launches that changes the competitive landscape.
Do you test every product yourself?
Our reviews combine engineering-grade compatibility analysis, manufacturer specifications, verified user reports, and hands-on testing where available. We clearly distinguish between directly tested findings and analytically derived conclusions. See our Disclaimer for full details.
Can I suggest a product for review?
Yes. Use our Contact page to suggest products. We prioritize suggestions based on market relevance, reader demand, and whether the product fills a gap in our existing category coverage.
How do you handle conflicts of interest?
Our primary conflict-of-interest policy: affiliate revenue cannot influence editorial decisions. Ratings are finalized before monetization links are added. Commission rates are never disclosed to editorial staff before review completion. See our Disclosure page for our complete affiliate relationship documentation.
What happens if I disagree with a rating?
We welcome substantive disagreements. Contact us with specific data points — your hardware, OS, use case, and experience. If your evidence contradicts our findings, we will update the review with credit.

Explore Our Reviews

Now that you understand how we evaluate products, explore our detailed category pages with full reviews, specifications, and recommendations.

Scroll to Top